Transformation of Accounting Under Conditions of Inter-Organizational Change: Opportunities and Challenges

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58423/2786-6742/2026-13-326-344

Keywords:

accounting, network accounting, interorganizational coordination, accountability, coordination, network structures

Abstract

The article examines the transformation of accounting under the influence of interorganizational changes and the growing role of network-based coordination in the modern economy. The relevance of the study lies in the fact that traditional accounting models, focused on a separate organization as a closed system, are increasingly misaligned with the realities of the modern business environment, dominated by strategic alliances, supply chains, and partner networks.. Based on the analysis of classical theoretical approaches to determining the boundaries of the firm, in particular, transaction theory, resource approach, and institutional economics, as well as the concepts of accountability and social embeddedness of economic activity, the need to rethink traditional accounting models is substantiated. The conceptualization of network accounting as a financial coordination tool that transcends the boundaries of a single organization and is aimed at supporting transparency, trust, and the consistency of actions between partners in the interorganizational space is proposed. The role of boundary spanners, who ensure communication, coordination of accounting practices, and adaptation of accounting procedures in multilateral partnerships, is defined. Empirical research in the fields of auditing, management accounting, and supply chains confirms that boundary spanners act as key agents of trust and transparency, serving as intermediaries between organizational and interorganizational reporting systems. The impact of digitalization on the transformation of accounting practices is separately considered. It is established that the use of ERP systems, "Big Data," and analytics further underscores the importance of boundary spanners, who serve as integrators between financial and technological subsystems. Digital tools not only automate processes but also create new requirements for accounting specialistsʼ competencies, in particular, the ability to integrate across systems and manage data in distributed networks. The results of the study indicate that the transformation of accounting in the context of interorganizational change is not only a technical update of the toolkit but also a fundamental paradigm shift that requires the formation of new rules for accountability, shared responsibility, and flexible forms of coordination.

Author Biography

Dmytro Zakharov , Zhytomyr Polytechnic State University

PhD, Associate Professor

References

1. Håkansson, H., & Lind, J. (2004). Accounting and network coordination. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(1), 51–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0361-3682(02)00058-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(02)00058-2

2. Hopwood, A. G. (2007). Whither accounting research? The Accounting Review, 82(5), 1365–1374. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30243502 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2007.82.5.1365

3. Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405. https://doi.org/10.2307/2626876 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x

4. Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications: A study in the economics of internal organization. Free Press. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1496220

5. Roberts, J. (1991). The possibilities of accountability. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 16(4), 355–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(91)90027-C DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(91)90027-C

6. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510. https://doi.org/10.1086/228311 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/228311

7. Zhuk, V. M. (2011). Institutional approach to solving accounting problems in Ukraine. Naukovyi visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu bioresursiv i pryrodokorystuvannia Ukrainy, 163(2), 11–17. https://magazine.faaf.org.ua/institucionalniy-pidhid-do-rozv-yazannya-problem-buhgalterskogo-obliku-v-ukraini.html [in Ukrainian].

8. Zhuk, V. (2017). Institutional theory of accounting: New opportunities and scales of profession. Zarządzanie Finansami i Rachunkowość, 5(1), 53–76. https://doi.org/10.22630/zfir.2017.5.1.05 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22630/ZFIR.2017.5.1.05

9. Yukhymenko-Nazaruk, I. A. (2017). Directions of accounting development in a network society: Institutional aspect. Problemy systemnoho pidkhodu v ekonomitsi, 3(59), 96–101 [in Ukrainian].

10. Yukhymenko-Nazaruk, I. A. (2017). Network concept of accounting organization. Naukovyi visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriia: Ekonomichni nauky, 25(2), 183–186 [in Ukrainian].

11. Hyk, V. V. (2018). Prerequisites for the formation of accounting and information support for cluster management. Problemy teorii ta metodolohii bukhhalterskoho obliku, kontroliu i analizu, 2(40), 7–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.26642/pbo-2018-2(40)-7-11 [in Ukrainian]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26642/pbo-2018-2(40)-7-11

12. Hyk, V. V. (2024). Development of accounting in cluster formations based on the provisions of agency and actor-network theories. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, 64. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-64-8 [in Ukrainian]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-64-8

13. Hrylitska, A. V., & Kryvoruchko, M. Yu. (2018). Modern paradigms and trends in the development of accounting in a network society. Naukovyi visnyk Poltavskoho universytetu ekonomiky i torhivli, 4(89), 88–93 [in Ukrainian].

14. Daff, L., & Jack, L. (2018). Accountants’ proactivity in intra-organisational networks: A strong structuration perspective. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31(6), 1691–1719. https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-08-2015-2190 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2015-2190

15. Canning, M., O’Dwyer, B., & Boomsma, R. (2022). Managing the offshoring of audit work: Spanning the boundaries between onshore and offshore auditors. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 41(2), 57–91. https://doi.org/10.2308/AJPT-18-055 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/AJPT-18-055

16. Güven-Uslu, P., Blaber, Z., & Adhikari, P. (2020). Boundary spanners and calculative practices. Financial Accountability & Management, 36(4), 439–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12266 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12266

17. Håkansson, H. (2010). Accounting in networks. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203854310 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203854310

18. Ezzamel, M. (1992). Corporate governance and financial control. In M. Ezzamel & D. Heathfield (Eds.), Perspectives on financial control (pp. 3–26). Chapman & Hall. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3053-8_1

19. Ouchi, W. G. (1980). Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(1), 129–141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2392231

20. Berry, A. J., Coad, A. F., Harris, E. P., Otley, D. T., & Stringer, C. (2009). Emerging themes in management control: A review of recent literature. The British Accounting Review, 41(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2008.09.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2008.09.001

21. Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295–336.

22. Chapman, C. S., Cooper, D. J., & Miller, P. (Eds.). (2009). Accounting, organizations, and institutions: Essays in honour of Anthony Hopwood. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199546350.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199546350.001.0001

Downloads

Published

2026-05-29

How to Cite

Zakharov , D. (2026). Transformation of Accounting Under Conditions of Inter-Organizational Change: Opportunities and Challenges . Acta Academiae Beregsasiensis. Economics, 1(13), 326–344. https://doi.org/10.58423/2786-6742/2026-13-326-344