Мonitoring the sustainability of small and medium business in the regions of Ukraine based on the resource approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58423/2786-6742/2022-1-218-228Keywords:
stakeholders, sustainability, social responsibility, business management, resource exchangeAbstract
The features of small and medium business in Ukraine require an integrated approach to sustainability management, which includes taking into account the positions of key stakeholders and their resource contribution to business activities. The main guideline in sustainability provision is the detection and scanning of social requirements, as well as adequate and timely response to the stakeholders’ requests. The purpose of the research is to monitor the level of imbalance of resource exchange between small and medium business and its key stakeholders in the regions of Ukraine. The following methods were used in the research: focus groups survey, statistical generalization, correlation-regression analysis, linear modeling, and graphical method. Based on the results of modeling the resource interaction of small and medium business with the main stakeholders, the vectors of the "ideal" and "real" resource exchange structure were constructed. The difference in the structures of these vectors reflects the imbalance of the existing resource exchange in the system, which can be expressed by the ratio of imbalance. The smaller the value of this ratio, the more balanced is resource exchange. It is proved that small businesses have an increased need for strong personal relationships with the local community and authorities. It is important for companies to identify the importance of stakeholders according to their resource contribution. To form a strategy of sustainability it is necessary to understand which of the stakeholders’ groups make the greatest contribution to the imbalance between the "ideal" and "real" resource exchange structure. The study shows that social responsibility is important not only for the internal policy of the business entity, but also when interacting with external environment, with stakeholders, both private and government, business partners. Only a responsibility for own and partner activities at each stage of communication can guarantee further synergy of results. Regional features of social development processes require appropriate measures of administrative regulation aimed at creating appropriate conditions for stimulating the social activity of small and medium businesses. The main direction of development of the modern regional development strategy is the priority of public needs.
References
Ackermann, F., Eden, C. (2011). Strategic management of stakeholders: Theory and practice. Long range planning, 44(3), 179-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2010.08.001
Aguinis, H., Villamor, I., Gabriel, K.P. (2020) Understanding employee responses to COVID-19: A behavioral corporate social responsibility perspective. Management Resources, 18, 421–438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MRJIAM-06-2020-1053
Borghesi, R., Houston, H., Naranjo, S. (2014) Corporate socially responsible investments: CEO altruism, reputation and shareholder interests. J. Corporate Finance, 26, 164–181 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.03.008
Carroll, A. B., Buchholtz, A. K. (2014) Business and society: Ethics, sustainability, and stakeholder management. Nelson Education.
Dnipro ODA (2021) Perelik rehionalnykh tsilovykh prohram … [Dnipro Regional State Administration (2021) List of regional target programs]. Retrieved from: https://adm.dp.gov.ua/storage/app/media/uploaded-files/perelik_RP_stanom_na_2602_2021.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Draper S. (2000) Corporate Nirvana. Is the future socially responsible? London: Industrial Society.
Farooq, O., Rupp, D.E., Farooq, M. (2017) The multiples pathways through which internal and external corporate social responsibility influence organizational identification and multifoci outcomes: The moderating role of cultural and social orientations. Academy of Management Review, 60, 954–985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0849
Fletcher, A., Guthrie, J., Steane, P., Roos, G., Pike, S. (2003). Mapping stakeholder perceptions for a third sector organization, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4(4), 505-527. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930310504536
Husyeva, O. YU., Voskoboyeva O. V., Khlevytska T. B. (2020) Sotsialna vidpovidalnist biznesu: navchalnyy posibnyk. Kyiv. Derzhavnyy universytet telekomunikatsiy [in Ukrainian].
Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P. (1992) The Balanced Scorecard – measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 71–79.
Laplume, A.O., Sonpar, K., Litz, R.A. (2008). Stakeholder theory: Reviewing a theory that moves us, Journal of Management, 34 (6), 1152-1189 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308324322
Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R., Wood D.J. (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. The Academy of Management Review, vol. 22, (4),853-886. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105
Nahornova, O. V. (2018) Korporatyvna sotsialna vidpovidalnist v upravlinni trudovymy resursamy.Visnyk Volynskoho instytutu ekonomiky ta menedzhmentu, vol. 20. 207-214. [in Ukrainian].
Sciarelli, M., Tani, M. (2013) Network Approach and Stakeholder Management. Business Systems Review, vol. 2 (2).
Sharov, Y. U., Chikarenko, I., Mamatova, T. (2012) Kontseptualno-metodolohichni polozhennya, pidkhody ta modeli realizatsiyi kontseptsiyi New Public Management. Kyiv, NADU [in Ukrainian].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Mariia Bieloborodova, Svitlana Bessonova, Anna Bessonova
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1969b/1969b75d43f222ee39a1dfab014e298d35e3fc1b" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons CC BY-NC License.