Resource Provision of Territorial Community Resilience in Wartime Crisis and Migration Challenges

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58423/2786-6742/2026-13-128-144

Keywords:

international projects in crisis conditions, resource provision of international activity, crisis management labor market shocks, community resilience, insurance, economic policy, EU standards, human capital, migration challenges

Abstract

The article focuses on strengthening community resilience in crisis conditions through the improvement of resource management systems of territorial communities under global instability caused by epidemic shocks, military conflicts, forced migration, full-scale war, and persistent structural economic imbalances. It is demonstrated that infrastructure destruction, demographic losses, large-scale population displacement, intensified migration processes, and the transformation of social and labor relations, combined with the shrinking financial and economic base of communities amid growing social needs, necessitate a shift from fragmented and reactive managerial practices to integrated and adaptive local governance models. The study substantiates that the resilience of territorial communities depends not only on the availability of resources but also on the capacity to strategically mobilize, digitally integrate, and effectively utilize human, social, and institutional capital, particularly in the context of migration-induced labor market shocks and workforce asymmetries. Drawing on resource mobilization theory, the concept of multidimensional community capital, approaches to vulnerability and capacity assessment, and the social-ecological resilience framework, the article identifies a research gap related to the insufficient systematization of managerial instruments for community development under the simultaneous influence of decentralization reforms, migration pressures, and wartime challenges. The synthesis of international and Ukrainian experience confirms the need to move beyond a narrowly finance-oriented management model toward a multifactor paradigm that integrates strategic planning instruments, digital and analytical tools, human capital development mechanisms, and approaches to managing intangible community assets. As a result, a comprehensive classification of instruments for effective resource management of territorial communities in crisis conditions is developed and structured according to their functional purpose, sources of mobilization, and implementation mechanisms. It is proven that enhancing community resilience during wartime and post-war recovery requires a combination of long-term strategic vision with flexible short-term managerial responses aimed at mitigating migration-related labor market shocks, strengthening institutional capacity, and ensuring inclusive and sustainable local development. The practical significance of the findings lies in their applicability for improving managerial decision-making, reinforcing the economic and organizational capacity of communities, and forming adaptive governance models capable of functioning under high uncertainty.

Author Biographies

Olena Korohodova , National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”

Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor

Natalya Chernenko , National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”

Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor

Yaroslava Hlushchenko , National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”

Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor

References

1. McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82(6), 1212–1241. https://doi.org/10.1086/226464 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/226464

2. Emery, M., & Flora, C. (2006). Spiraling-up: Mapping community transformation with community capitals framework. Community Development, 37(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330609490152 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330609490152

3. Postek, L., & Walerych, M. (2026). The impact of Ukrainian immigration on labour market dynamics in Poland: A Bayesian VAR analysis. Economic Modelling, (155), Article 107441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2025.107441 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2025.107441

4. Wagle, U. R. (2024). Labor migration, remittances, and the economy in the Gulf Cooperation Council region. Comparative Migration Studies, (12), Article 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-024-00390-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-024-00390-3

5. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. (2006). Vulnerability and capacity assessment: Lessons learned and recommendations. IFRC. https://www.ifrc.org/docs/idrl/I1040EN.pdf

6. Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 253–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002

7. Fuentes, M., Cárdenas, J. P., Olivares, G., Rasmussen, E., Urbina, C., Salazar, S., & Vidal, G. (2024). Harnessing network science for urban resilience: The CASA model’s approach to social and environmental challenges. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.08015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-025-00703-0

8. De Iuliis, M., Kammouh, O., & Cimellaro, G. P. (2022). Measuring and improving community resilience: A fuzzy logic approach. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2204.04335 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103118

9. Hrymak, I. (2024). The role of the public in the formation and improvement of governance for creating a favorable environment for the development of territorial communities. Publichne upravlinnia: kontseptsii, paradyhma, rozvytok, udoskonalennia, (8), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.31470/2786-6246-2024-8-44-54 [in Ukrainian]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31470/2786-6246-2024-8-44-54

10. Korchynska, O., Yaremko, I., Bilyk, O., Dorosh, I., & Myroshnychenko, A. (2025). Public administration tools for building local communities: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 1(11), 45–56. https://oidaijsd.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/18-11-04-03-UR3-25-OK.pdf

11. Chernenko, N., Korohodova, O., & Hlushchenko, Y. (2025). Crisis management in the local communities through the development of human capital. Achievements of the Economy: Prospects and Innovations, (20). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15846559

12. Chernenko, N. O., Korohodova, O. O., & Hlushchenko, Ya. I. (2025). Theoretical and methodological foundations and practical instruments of resource provision of local communities. Zdobutky ekonomiky: perspektyvy ta innovatsii, (20). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16384599 [in Ukrainian].

13. Norris, F. H., Stevens, S. P., Pfefferbaum, B., Wyche, K. F., & Pfefferbaum, R. L. (2008). Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(1–2), 127–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6

14. Pakhnenko, O. M. (2022). The essence and components of community resilience in the context of COVID-19. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, (39). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2022-39-51 [in Ukrainian]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2022-39-51

15. Stolyaryk, O. (2025). Modern conceptions of community resilience: Lessons for training social workers. Social Work and Education, 12(1), 98–115. https://doi.org/10.25128/2520-6230.25.1.8 [in Ukrainian]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25128/2520-6230.25.1.8

16. Mamatova, T., & Borysenko, V. (2023). The theoretical foundations of studying public administration processes in ensuring the resilience of territorial communities in Ukraine. Derzhavne upravlinnia ta mistseve samovriaduvannia, (2). https://doi.org/10.32782/2414-4436/2023-2-9 [in Ukrainian]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2414-4436/2023-2-9

17. Baćilo, I. (2025). Rescue Light Communication System (RLCS): Enhancing emergency signaling in crisis situations. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.18485/ijdrm.2025.7.1.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18485/ijdrm.2025.7.1.4

18. Vasylchenko, H., Parasiuk, I., & Yeremenko, N. (2015). Planning the development of territorial communities: A textbook for local government officials. TOV “Pidpryiemstvo ‘VI EN EI’”. https://www.auc.org.ua/sites/default/files/library/1plangrweb.pdf [in Ukrainian].

19. Hlushchenko, Ya., Korohodova, O., Moiseienko, T., & Chernenko, N. (2024). Features and principles of foresight of international activity. Pidpryiemnytstvo ta innovatsii, (33), 144–150. https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-3583/33.25 [in Ukrainian]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-3583/33.25

20. How to effectively implement project management in communities? (2024). Merezha UPLAN. https://uplan.org.ua/news/iak-efektyvno-vprovadzhuvaty-proiektnyi-menedzhment-u-hromady [in Ukrainian].

21. European Commission. (2020). Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) 2020: Methodological note. https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=67082

22. Meijer, A., & Bolívar, M. P. R. (2016). Governing the smart city: A review of the literature on smart urban governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(2), 392–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314564308 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314564308

23. Klievink, B., Romijn, B. J., Cunningham, S., et al. (2017). Big data in the public sector: Uncertainties and readiness. Information Systems Frontiers, (19), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9686-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9686-2

24. Storonianska, I. Z. (Ed.). (2022). Challenges and priorities of asset management of territorial communities under wartime conditions: Scientific and analytical report. DU “Instytut rehionalnykh doslidzhen imeni M. I. Dolishnoho NAN Ukrainy”. https://ird.gov.ua/irdp/p20220034.pdf [in Ukrainian].

25. Sofianopoulos, S., Faka, A., & Chalkias, C. (2025). SDI-enabled smart governance: A review (2015–2025) of IoT, AI and geospatial technologies: Applications and challenges. Land, 14(7), Article 1399. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14071399 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land14071399

26. European Commission. (2024). Report on the state of the Digital Decade 2024. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/report-state-digital-decade-2024

27. United Nations Development Programme. (2023). UNDP announces a grant to enhance the capacity of regional and local development agencies in partner communities. United Nations Development Programme in Ukraine. https://www.undp.org/uk/ukraine/news/proon-oholoshuye-hrant-dlya-pokrashchennya-spromozhnosti-ahentsiy-rehionalnoho-ta-mistsevoho-rozvytku-u-partnerskykh-hromadakh [in Ukrainian].

28. Ushenko, N., & Kurochka, O. (2025). State and dynamics of human capital development: Cross-country comparisons of the EU and Ukraine. Chasopys ekonomichnykh reform, (4), 123–134. [in Ukrainian].

29. Chernenko, N., & Hlushchenko, Ya. (2025). Resource provision of communities and resilience of critical infrastructure under crisis conditions. Acta Academiae Beregsasiensis. Economics, (10), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.58423/2786-6742/2025-10-263-275 [in Ukrainian]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58423/2786-6742/2025-10-263-275

30. LRHub. (2023). Strengthening community capacity for recovery through piloting cooperation with universities. https://lrhub.org.ua/en/projects/21 [in Ukrainian].

31. National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute.” (n.d.). Policy on cooperation with the local community to improve healthcare and well-being systems, including programs for displaced persons or refugees. https://kpi.ua/policy/local [in Ukrainian].

32. Pronko, L. M., Zataidukh, K. Yu., & Chornyi, Ya. I. (2024). Economic development of territorial communities: Essence, features and strategic prospects. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, (59). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-59-65 [in Ukrainian]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-59-65

33. Zhydyk, Ya., & Didur, I. (2025). Top 3 obstacles preventing communities from developing projects and attracting funding. Detsentralizatsiia v Ukraini. https://decentralization.ua/news/19457 [in Ukrainian].

34. Hlushchenko, Y., Korohodova, O., Chernenko, N., & Moiseienko, T. (2023). The path to Industry 5.0: A green economy evolution and energy innovations for sustainable development. Economic Bulletin of NTUU KPI, (26), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.20535/2307-5651.26.2023.287404 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15388/Ekon.2024.104.2.2

Downloads

Published

2026-05-29

How to Cite

Korohodova , O., Chernenko , N., & Hlushchenko , Y. (2026). Resource Provision of Territorial Community Resilience in Wartime Crisis and Migration Challenges . Acta Academiae Beregsasiensis. Economics, 1(13), 128–144. https://doi.org/10.58423/2786-6742/2026-13-128-144