Accounting and Reporting in the Context of Overcoming Information Asymmetry in the Sustainable Business Development Management System

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58423/2786-6742/2026-13-444-459

Keywords:

sustainable enterprise development, integrated accounting system, ESG reporting, non-financial information, accounting transformation, integrated reporting, corporate social responsibility, digital transformation

Abstract

The contemporary evolution of economic relations, driven by increasing requirements for business transparency and the consideration of social and environmental impacts of economic activity, necessitates a reconsideration of the role of accounting and reporting. The article provides a theoretical generalization and scientific substantiation of the transformation of accounting systems in the context of sustainable development. The subject of the study is the process of integrating financial and non-financial aspects of enterprise activity into a unified accounting and analytical system aimed at reflecting multidimensional corporate value. The purpose of the study is to reveal the conceptual foundations of the transition from a financially determined accounting model to an integrated model that provides an informational basis for the strategic management of economic, social, and environmental parameters of enterprise functioning. The methodological framework of the research is based on the application of systemic, institutional, and evolutionary approaches, as well as methods of scientific abstraction, comparative analysis, classification, and logical generalization. This made it possible to identify key stages in the development of accounting systems, trace changes in their functional orientation, and substantiate the expansion of accounting objects under the influence of international sustainability standards and the digitalization of business processes. The study substantiates that the modern transformation of accounting is systemic in nature and is manifested in the transition to an integrated model, within which financial, social, and environmental indicators converge within a single information space. It is determined that the implementation of ESG reporting standards and integrated disclosure contributes to reducing information asymmetry, enhancing the relevance of reporting data, and aligning corporate strategy with Sustainable development goals. The role of digital technologies is substantiated as an infrastructural driver of accounting transformation, ensuring the verifiability, traceability, and analytical richness of non-financial information. The scope of application of the results includes enterprise accounting policy development, corporate governance systems, and the preparation of financial, ESG, and integrated reporting in the context of the implementation of international standards. The proposed provisions can be used to improve the information support of managerial decision-making and to enhance the effectiveness of stakeholder communication. It is concluded that the transformation of accounting and reporting reflects profound institutional changes in the economy and leads to their reorientation from retrospective recording of results to the formation of an informational basis for the strategic management of sustainable enterprise development. The integration of financial and non-financial dimensions of activity is considered a key prerequisite for ensuring long-term sustainability and creating comprehensive corporate value.

Author Biographies

Nadiia Shkromyda, Vasyl Stefanyk Carpathian National University

Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor

Yuliia Maksymiv, Vasyl Stefanyk Carpathian National University

Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor

Alina Hrubelias , Vasyl Stefanyk Carpathian National University

Master's degree

References

1. Seletska, D. O. (2024). Regulatory framework for sustainability reporting. Problems of Theory and Methodology of Accounting, Control and Analysis, 2(58), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.26642/pbo-2024-2(58)-58-66 [in Ukrainian] DOI: https://doi.org/10.26642/pbo-2024-2(58)-58-66

2. Bohatshyk, L., Lopatovytskyi, V., Lopatovytska, O., & Melnychuk, I. (2025). Accounting and reporting of ESG indicators as a tool for increasing business transparency in the context of sustainable development. Herald of Khmelnytskyi National University. Economic Sciences, 346(5), 464–472. https://doi.org/10.31891/2307-5740-2025-346-5-68 [in Ukrainian]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31891/2307-5740-2025-346-5-68

3. Chmut, A. V. (2025). CSRD as a tool for sustainable recovery of Ukraine: prospects for implementation of ESG reporting standards. Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State University. Series "Economic Sciences", (57). https://doi.org/10.32999/ksu2307-8030/2025-57-10 [in Ukrainian]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32999/ksu2307-8030/2025-57-10

4. Oliinyk, O. V., & Ivanytskyi, V. M. (2025). Managerial dimension of ESG reporting: conceptual principles of integration into corporate accounting systems. Problems of Theory and Methodology of Accounting, Control and Analysis, 2(61), 47–53. https://doi.org/10.26642/pbo-2025-2(61)-47-53 [in Ukrainian]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26642/pbo-2025-2(61)-47-53

5. Sutisman, E., Auliyah, I., & Noy, I. (2024). Accounting for society: Examining the interplay between financial reporting and social responsibility. Advances in Applied Accounting Research, 2(1), 54–70. https://doi.org/10.60079/aaar.v2i1.166 DOI: https://doi.org/10.60079/aaar.v2i1.166

6. Lestari, P. A., & Gangodawilage, D. (2025). Sustainability accounting and the future of ESG reporting: Investor insights. Sinergi International Journal of Accounting and Taxation, 3(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.61194/ijat.v3i1.488 DOI: https://doi.org/10.61194/ijat.v3i1.488

7. Kurnia, I., Purwanti, A., Judijanto, L., Samiun, A. A., & Saripujiana, D. (2024). Integrating ESG metrics into traditional accounting systems: A framework for future practice. Journal of Economic, Business and Accounting (COSTING), 7(6), 12381. https://doi.org/10.31539/costing.v7i6.12381 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31539/costing.v7i6.12381

8. Seletska, D. O. (2024). Formation of ESG reporting according to GRI standards: social aspect. Problems of Theory and Methodology of Accounting, Control and Analysis, 3(59), 20–36. https://doi.org/10.26642/pbo-2024-3(59)-20-36 [in Ukrainian]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26642/pbo-2024-3(59)-20-36

9. Sundarasen, S., Rajagopalan, U., & Alsmady, A. A. (2024). Environmental accounting and sustainability: A meta-synthesis. Sustainability, 16(21), 9341. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219341 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219341

10. International Sustainability Standards Board. (2023). IFRS S1 General Requirements for Disclosure of Sustainability-related Financial Information. https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/ifrs-sustainability-standards-navigator/ifrs-s1-general-requirements/

11. International Sustainability Standards Board. (2023). IFRS S2 Climate-related Disclosures. https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/ifrs-sustainability-standards-navigator/ifrs-s2-climate-related-disclosures/

12. European Commission. (2023). Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772 establishing ESRS. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2023/2772/oj/eng

13. Ittipornpaisarn, P., & Sae-Lim, P. (2025). Are companies really awaking in ESG? Analyzing ESG disclosure toward corporate sustainability text data. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-025-00309-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4965940

14. Maksymiv, Y., Skromyda, N., & Urbancic, J. (2024). Accounting and Reporting in Supporting the Transition to a Circular Economy: a Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, 11(4), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.15330/jpnu.11.4.101-110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15330/jpnu.11.4.101-110

15. Teh, D., & Khan, T. (2024). Sustainability-focused accounting, management, and governance research: A bibliometric analysis. Sustainability, 16(23), 10435. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310435 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310435

16. Roszak, S., Sandu, R., Königsgruber, R., & Ramid, S. (2025). The practice turn in integrated reporting (IR) research: a comprehensive review. Accounting Auditing & Control, 31(1), 7–51. https://doi.org/10.3917/cca.311.0007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/cca.311.0007

17. Kampiotis, G., Thanasas, G. L., Gorodyskiy, M., & Bereznyi, O. (2025). Blockchain in the New Era of Accounting: A PRISMA-Guided Review on Trends and Future Prospects. Public Policy and Accounting, (12), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.26642/ppa-2025-2(12)-3-12 [in Ukrainian] DOI: https://doi.org/10.26642/ppa-2025-2(12)-3-12

18. Ahmed, W. (2025). Blockchain and Big Data Integration in Financial Transparency: Explore How Combining Blockchain with Big Data Improves Transparency in Financial Reporting and Fraud Detection. Journal of Economics, Business, and Commerce, 2(2), 129–134. https://doi.org/10.69739/jebc.v2i2.967 DOI: https://doi.org/10.69739/jebc.v2i2.967

19. Parra-Domínguez, J., Sanz Martín, L., López Pérez, G., & Zafra Gómez, J. L. (2025). The disruption of blockchain technology in accounting: A review of scientific progress. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 21(7), 330–362. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-10-2024-0327 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-10-2024-0327

Downloads

Published

2026-05-29

How to Cite

Shkromyda, N., Maksymiv, Y., & Hrubelias , A. (2026). Accounting and Reporting in the Context of Overcoming Information Asymmetry in the Sustainable Business Development Management System. Acta Academiae Beregsasiensis. Economics, 1(13), 444–459. https://doi.org/10.58423/2786-6742/2026-13-444-459