Innovation Activity of Agricultural Business: Stimulation under Martial Law Conditions

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58423/2786-6742/2026-13-284-301

Keywords:

Innovative activity, agrarian business, competitiveness, innovative development, state support, innovation strategies

Abstract

Under conditions of significant risks affecting the agricultural sector, innovative activity of agricultural enterprises becomes especially relevant as a key instrument for ensuring their competitiveness, adaptability, and resilience to crisis phenomena. The purpose of the study is the theoretical substantiation and development of practical recommendations for stimulating the innovative activity of agricultural enterprises under martial law conditions. The article establishes that, despite the decline in Ukraine’s position in the Global Innovation Index (GII), the stability of the overall innovation index indicates a transition of agribusiness to a model of “mobilization innovation.” It is determined that “Resource Intensity and Efficiency” and “Natural Capital” are the main drivers of survival in the agricultural sector, while critically low indicators of intellectual capital and the quality of public governance represent the key systemic barriers to innovative development. The authors’ original scientific contribution is the development of a proprietary “Diagnosis of the Impact of Non-Financial Factors on the Innovation Activity of the Agricultural Sector,” which systematizes five key factors with a quantitative assessment of their impact. The study proves the insufficient effectiveness of existing mechanisms of state support. The feasibility of adapting the Israeli model of co-financing high-risk projects through a network of innovation incubators is substantiated, where the state shares financial risks with private investors. An original four-level systematization of innovation priorities by functional clusters has been developed: “Critical Resilience,” “Operational Stability,” “Structural Transformation,” and “Recovery and Prospects”. This hierarchy enables agricultural enterprises to rationally allocate limited investment resources depending on the level of threats and the strategic planning horizon. An authorial “Strategic Plan for the Implementation of Resilience Innovations” for the project period 2026–2029 has been proposed. The fundamental advantage of the proposed model lies in the fact that each subsequent stage is financed through resources saved at the previous stage, forming a mechanism for the self-reproduction of innovative transformations without the need for external funding.

Author Biographies

Alisa Shevchenko, Odessa State Agrarian University

Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor

Olga Petrenko, Odessa State Agrarian University

Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor

Yevheniy Kitoraga , Odessa State Agrarian University

Master's degree

References

1. Shevchenko, A. A., Petrenko, O. P., & Ziuzina, A. Y. (2024). Peculiarities of strategic development of enterprises under martial law. Scientific Perspectives, (9(51)), 421–434. http://perspectives.pp.ua/index.php/np/article/view/15170/15240 [in Ukrainian]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52058/2708-7530-2024-9(51)-421-435

2. Vlasiuk, N. I. (2024). Organization of innovative activity of enterprises under martial law. Visnyk Lvivskoho torhovelno-ekonomichnoho universytetu. Ekonomichni nauky, (79), 87–93. https://journals-lute.lviv.ua/index.php/visnyk-econom/article/view/1684/1583 [in Ukrainian].

3. Balaban, M. P., Marakhovska, M. M., & Voskobiinyk, S. Ya. (2024). Innovation strategies in entrepreneurship: Influence on competitiveness of small and medium-sized businesses. Akademichni vizii, (37). https://academy-vision.org/index.php/av/article/view/1522 [in Ukrainian]

4. Vrabcová, P., & Urbancová, H. (2023). Sustainable innovation in agriculture: Building competitiveness and business sustainability. Agricultural Economics, 69(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.17221/321/2022-AGRICECON DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/321/2022-AGRICECON

5. Zastempowski, M., & Cyfert, S. (2022). The role of strategic innovation activities in creating Spanish agriculture companies' innovativeness. Agricultural Economics, 68(6), 230–238. https://doi.org/10.17221/66/2022-AGRICECON DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/66/2022-AGRICECON

6. Kotvytska, N., & Skorodid, S. (2025). Innovation policy of the enterprise: organizational and economic aspect of adaptation to the challenges of martial law. Visnyk Sumskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu, (3(103)), 13–19. https://snaujournal.com.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/390/287 [in Ukrainian].

7. Antoniuk, L. L., & Pelykh, V. A. (2020). Innovation management: theory and practice. KNEU. [in Ukrainian].

8. Ihnatenko, M. M., Levaieva, L. Yu., & Bilousov, Ye. Yu. (2025). The role of technological innovations in ensuring the competitiveness of agricultural enterprises. Efektyvna ekonomika, (2). https://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2105.2025.2.41 [in Ukrainian]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2105.2025.2.41

9. Chaparro-Banegas, N., Mas-Verdú, F., & Tortosa-Ausina, E. (2024). Transforming the agri-food sector through eco-innovation: A path to sustainability and technological progress. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(8), 7620–7638. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3968 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3968

10. Shabatura, T., Balian, A., Stepanova, M., Yakovenko, A., & Petrenko, O. (2026). Digital agro-innovations as a strategic tool for agricultural adaptation. In Data-Centric Business and Applications. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, (275), 187–204. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-10153-2_9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-10153-2_9

11. Solability. (2024). Global Sustainable Competitiveness Index 2024. https://solability.com/pdfs/gsci-report-2024.pdf

12. Linde, N., Balian, A., Shabatura, T., Gryshova, I., Petrenko, O., & Shevchenko, A. (2024). Agricultural technologies as a tool for integrating artificial intelligence into the agricultural infrastructure of Ukraine. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 7(3), 26–47. https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.0703ukr02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.0703ukr02

13. Shevchenko, A. A., Petrenko, O. P., & Nikiforchuk, M. (2025). Resource potential of agricultural enterprises as a basis for innovative diversification of activities. Acta Academiae Beregsasiensis. Economics, (8), 297–311. https://doi.org/10.58423/2786-6742/2025-8-297-311 [in Ukrainian]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58423/2786-6742/2025-8-297-311

14. Korotaieva, O. V. (2024). Innovative activity of industrial enterprises of Ukraine in the context of digitalization: current state, problems, directions of improvement. Actual Problems of Economics, 2(281), 80–90. https://eco-science.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/11.24-2._topic_Olha-Korotaieva-80-90.pdf [in Ukrainian].

15. Petrenko, O., & Shevchenko, A. (2024). Adaptation of agricultural production to wartime realities: Preservation of economic security of Ukraine. Galician Economic Journal, (3(88)), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.33108/galicianvisnyk_tntu2024.03.020 [in Ukrainian]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33108/galicianvisnyk_tntu2024.03.020

16. Jankelová, N., & Joniaková, Z. (2021). The role of innovative work behaviour and knowledge-based dynamic capabilities in increasing the innovative performance of agricultural enterprises. Agricultural Economics, 67(9), 363–372. https://doi.org/10.17221/151/2021-AGRICECON DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/151/2021-AGRICECON

17. Khorobchuk, V., & Pilko, A. (2024). Analysis of models of innovative development. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, (68). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-68-92 [in Ukrainian]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-68-92

18. Pysarenko, T. V., Kuranda, T. K., et al. (2024). Scientific, scientific-technical and innovative activity in Ukraine in 2024: scientific and analytical report. UkrINTEI. [in Ukrainian].

19. National Research Foundation of Ukraine. (n.d.). The impact of war on Ukrainian research. https://nrfu.org.ua/news/vplyv-vijny-na-ukrayinski-doslidzhennya/[in Ukrainian].

Downloads

Published

2026-05-29

How to Cite

Shevchenko, A., Petrenko, O., & Kitoraga , Y. (2026). Innovation Activity of Agricultural Business: Stimulation under Martial Law Conditions. Acta Academiae Beregsasiensis. Economics, 1(13), 284–301. https://doi.org/10.58423/2786-6742/2026-13-284-301