Modeling of the reporting activities of a crane manufacturing organization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58423/2786-6742/2022-1-274-282Keywords:
performance evaluation, controlling, reporting, KPI management, modelingAbstract
Industrial manufacturing activity has changed significantly in recent years. In addition to standardized - mass production processes, customer - oriented individual production activities have become increasingly strong. In custom manufacturing with a customer focus, the customer is not only a passive observer but also an active participant in the design and manufacturing processes. Due to their unique nature, evaluating the performance of organizations can present a number of challenges. As a result of the development of digitalisation and economic IT innovations, an extensive system of tools is available, and a number of methods can be used to analyze the measured data. Among the analysis methodologies, the Key Performance Indicator (KPI) management, which is the basis of controlling systems, should be highlighted. As a result of the changes, the evaluation and expression of organizational performance should no longer focus on analyzing current conditions, but on forecasting expected future performance. In order to achieve this, the use of efficient infrastructure and professional and statistical-mathematical methods is formulated as a basic requirement. The interpretation of the information content of predictive KPIs and thus management decision support should depend on different assessments and standardization norms. Nowadays, organizational performance evaluation can be regarded as a basic controlling task, during which the goal is the extensive exploration and evaluation of organizational performance. Management is limitedly rational when making decisions, which means that it can only make decisions based on available information. The purpose of the controlling is to provide the management with a reporting activity that is suitable for evaluating the processes and making future-oriented decisions by uncovering extensive information and extensive methodological analysis of the data. It is therefore particularly emphasized that management should no longer be reactive, but proactive, which can be achieved by evaluating predictive analyzes and making decisions based on the information derived from the predictive evaluations.
References
Asih, I. - Purba, H. H. - Sitorus, T. M. (2020) Key Performance Indicators: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Strategy & Performance Management, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 142-155.
Babbie, E. (2012) The Practice of Social Research, 13th Edition, New York: Wadsworth Publishing. pp. 52-61. ISBN 978-1133049791
Barta, Á. - Molnár, M. (2021) Forecasting oil price based on online occurrence. Modern Science, Vol. 1, pp. 5-11.
Boda, B. (2015) A teljesítményértékelés szervezeti és egyéni dimenziói a köz- és a versenyszférában. Hadtudomány, 25 évf. pp. 91-101.
Brown, M. G. (1996) Keeping Score: Using the Right Metrics to Drive World-class Performance. New York: Quality Resources. 12-17. p. ISBN 978-0814403273
Brundage, M. P. - Bernstein, W. Z. - Morris, K. C. - Horst, J. A. (2017) Using Graphbased Visualizations to Explore Key Performance Indicator Relationships for Manufacturing Production Systems. Procedia CIRP, Vol. 61, pp. 451– 456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.176
Chege, S. M. - Wang, D. (2020) The impact of entrepreneurs’ environmental analysis strategy on organizational performance. Journal of Rural Studies, Vol. 77, pp. 113-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.04.008
Domínguez, E. - Pére, B. - Rubio, Á. L. - Zapata, M. A. (2019) A taxonomy for key performance indicators management. Computer Standards & Interfaces, Vol. 64 pp. 24-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2018.12.001
Duru, O. - Bulut, E. - Huang, S. - Yoshida, S. (2013) Shipping Performance Assessment and the Role of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs): 'Quality Function Deployment' for Transforming Shipowner's Expectation. SSRN Electronic Journal, pp. 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2195984
Fanning, K. (2016) Big Data and KPIs: A Valuable Connection. Corporate Accounting and Finance, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp 17-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22137
Kang, N. – Zhao, C. – Li, J. – Horst, J. A. (2016) A Hierarchical structure of key performance indicators for operation management and continuous improvement in production systems. International Journal of Production Research, 5421, pp. 6333–6350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1136082
Liebrecht, C. – Jacob, A. – Kuhnle, A. – Lanza, G. (2017) Multi-criteria Evaluation of Manufacturing Systems 4.0 under Uncertainty. Procedia CIRP, Vol. 63, pp. 224–229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.147
Malaga, A. - Vinodh, S. (2021) "Evaluation of smart manufacturing performance using a grey theory-based approach: a case study", (2021) Evaluation of smart manufacturing performance using a grey theory-based approach: a case study, Grey Systems: Theory and Application, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 522-550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/GS-04-2021-0049
Parmenter, D. (2007) Key performance indicators (KPI): Developing, implementing, and using winning KPIs. Hoboken: J. Wiley. pp. 384. ISBN13 (EAN): 9781119620778
Peral, J. - Maté, A. - Marco, M. (2016) Application of data mining techniques to identify relevant key performance indicators. Computer Standards & Interfaces, Vol. 54, Issue 2, pp. 76-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2016.11.006
Schnellbach, P. - Reinhart, G. (2015) Evaluating the effects of energy productivity measures on lean production key performance indicators. Procedia CIRP, Vol. 25, pp. 492-497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.07.094
Simons, R. (2000) Performance Measurement and Control Systems for Implementing Strategy. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. 17-18. p. ISBN 978-0132340069
Xu, L. D. - Xu, E. L. - Li, L. (2018) Industry 4.0: State of the art and future trends. International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 56, Issue 8, pp. 2941–2962. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1444806
Yu, S. - Lee, J. (2019) The effects of consumers’ perceived values on intention to purchase upcycled products. Sustainability, Vol. 11, pp. 1034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041034
Zéman, Z. - Béhm, I. (2019) Módszertan vállalkozások pénzügyi teljesítményének mérésére. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó Zrt. pp. 260 ISBN: 9789634543558 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/9789634543558
Zéman, Z. - Mallinguh, E. B. (2020) An evaluation of the Fintech companies and the financial sector in Hungary. Economics & Working Capital, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 2-9.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Gergő Thalmeiner, Sándor Gáspár, Zoltán Zéman
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1969b/1969b75d43f222ee39a1dfab014e298d35e3fc1b" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons CC BY-NC License.