Comparative Analysis of National and International Standards for Accounts Receivable Accounting: The Experience of Ukraine and Foreign Countries

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58423/2786-6742/2025-10-532-544

Keywords:

accounts receivable, IFRS, NAS, financial statements, allowance for doubtful account, valuation methods, accounting harmonization, credit risk, financial information transparency

Abstract

The article explores the theoretical and practical aspects of the recognition, measurement, and presentation of accounts receivable in the accounting system under National Accounting Standards and International Financial Reporting Standards. It reveals the differences in the interpretation of the term "accounts receivable." The study determines that the concept of accounts receivable combines both economic and legal components: on the one hand, it is the right of an organization to obtain future economic benefits, and on the other, it is a liability of partners based on contractual relationships. A comparative analysis of the recognition, measurement, and presentation of accounts receivable in the accounting system made it possible to establish that the application of national accounting standards is characterized by a simpler approach compared to international norms. Under national standards, accounts receivable are recognized and measured at initial cost, and at the balance sheet date, at net realizable value, which is with an allowance for doubtful accounts. IFRS, however, is based on an expected credit loss model that takes into account forecast risks and economic conditions. The study identifies key problems in the field of accounting: the formal nature of creating allowances for doubtful accounts, the difficulty of implementing international requirements due to limited information bases, and the need for highly professional training of specialists.  The necessity of harmonizing national standards with international ones, developing the infrastructure for collecting data on the payment discipline of counterparties, and using digital technologies for risk management is substantiated. The results can be used to improve the reliability of financial reporting, enhance accounting practices, and strengthen the competitiveness of Ukrainian enterprises in the international business environment.

Author Biographies

Nataliya Stoika, Ferenc Rakoczi II Transcarpathian Hungarian College of Higher Education (FR II THCHE)

Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor

Viktoriia Makarovych, Ferenc Rakoczi II Transcarpathian Hungarian College of Higher Education (FR II THCHE)

Doctor of Science in Economics, Associate Professor

Nikoletta Pomaskina, Ferenc Rakoczi II Transcarpathian Hungarian College of Higher Education (FR II THCHE)

Master's degree

References

1. National Accounting Regulation (Standard) 10 “Receivables”. Order of the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine No. 237 (1999). URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0725-99#Text [in Ukrainian].

2. National Accounting Regulation (Standard) 13 “Financial Instruments”. Order of the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine No. 433 (2013). URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z1050-01#Text [in Ukrainian].

3. International Financial Reporting Standard 9 “Financial Instruments”. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/929_016#Text [in Ukrainian].

4. International Financial Reporting Standard 7 “Financial Instruments: Disclosure”. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/929_007#Text [in Ukrainian].

5. International Accounting Standard 32 “Financial Instruments: Presentation”. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/929_029#Text [in Ukrainian].

6. International Accounting Standard 39 “Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement”. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/929_015#n474 [in Ukrainian].

7. Tyrinov, A. V. (2016). Debitorska zaborhovanist pidpryiemstva: spetsyfika i sutnist [Accounts receivable of the enterprise: specifics and essence]. Prychornomski ekonomichni studii, № 9(2), 112-116. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/bses_2016_9(2)__26 [in Ukrainian].

8. Hnatenko, Ye. P., Melnichenko, S. S. (2013). Metodychni pidkhody shchodo vyznachennia ponyattia "debitorska zaborhovanist" [Methodological approaches to defining the concept of "receivables"]. Ekonomichni nauky. Ser.: Oblik i finansy, № 10(1). URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ecnof_2013_10%281%29__21 [in Ukrainian].

9. Kolisnyk, O. P., Zamota, I. O. (2019). Teoretychni ta praktychni aspekty obliku i analizu debitorskoi zaborhovanosti u sferi informatsii ta telekomunikatsii [Theoretical and practical aspects of accounting and analysis of receivables in the information and telecommunications sector]. Modern economics, № 15, 108-113. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/modecon_2019_15_17 [in Ukrainian].

10. Bilyk, M. D. (2003). Upravlinnia debitorskoi zaborhovanistiu pidpryiemstv [Management of receivables of enterprises]. Finansy Ukrainy, № 12, 24-36 [in Ukrainian].

11. Butynets, F. F. (2013). Bukhhalterskyi finansovyi oblik [Accounting and financial accounting]: pidruchnyk: Ch. 8. Zhytomyr: PP «Ruta» [in Ukrainian].

12. Lishchenko, O. H., Beskota, H. M. (2009). Analiz debitorskoi zaborhovanosti v systemi upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom [Analysis of receivables in the enterprise management system]. Derzhava i rehiony, № 1, 114–117 [in Ukrainian].

13. Brigham, Ye. (1997). Osnovy finansovoho menedzhmentu [Fundamentals of financial management]. Kyiv: Molod [in Ukrainian].

14. Drabanich, A. V. (2016). Debitorska zaborhovanist pidpryiemstva: ponyattia ta struktura [Enterprise receivables: concept and structure]. Bukhhalterskyi oblik, analiz ta audit: problemy teorii, metodolohii, orhanizatsii, № 2, 31-41. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/boaa_2016_2_6 [in Ukrainian].

15. Karmazina, N. V. (2018). Oblikove zabezpechennia debitorskoi zaborhovanosti: problemy ta shliakhy yoho vyrishennia [Accounting for receivables: problems and ways to solve them]. Aktualni problemy rozvytku ekonomiky rehionu, № 14(1), 175-181. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/aprer_2018_14(1)__28 [in Ukrainian].

Published

2025-09-30