Reporting Without Borders: Ukrainian Realities in the IFRS Context

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58423/2786-6742/2025-9-189-202

Keywords:

financial reporting, International Standards, National Standards, implementation, harmonization, conceptual differences

Abstract

In the contemporary global landscape, financial reporting has transcended the internal affairs of individual states or enterprises. Amidst globalization, integration into global capital markets, and the escalating role of investors, standards of transparency, understandability, and comparability of reporting are acquiring paramount significance. International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) have become the "common language of business" for over 140 countries worldwide. Simultaneously, Ukraine, despite substantial progress in IFRS implementation, continues to encounter a range of challenges, spanning from regulatory inconsistencies to practical difficulties in applying the standards within the domestic environment. The purpose of the article is to analyze the correlation between the national accounting system and IFRS, to identify existing gaps, and to assess the readiness of Ukrainian enterprises for full-fledged reporting under international regulations. The methodological foundation of the study comprises a synthesis of general scientific and specialized cognitive methods, enabling a comprehensive elucidation of the harmonization processes between the national accounting and financial reporting system and international standards. These methods include elements of analysis and synthesis; the comparative method; the systems approach; the generalization method; the institutional approach; and empirical methods (content analysis of scientific sources, regulatory frameworks, and enterprise financial statements). The analysis of scientific literature and the regulatory framework revealed significant discrepancies in the conceptual foundations, valuation principles, recognition criteria, and disclosure requirements between IFRS and National Accounting Regulations (NAS). It was determined that IFRS are based on the principle of economic substance and are oriented towards the needs of a broad spectrum of users, including investors, whereas NAS are more focused on legal form and the requirements of state regulators. The practical experience of Ukrainian enterprises was investigated. A distinct list of IFRS that lack complete analogues within the national accounting system was identified, highlighting substantial methodological gaps and complicating the transition to international standards. A series of measures to ensure the effective implementation of IFRS were proposed, including legislative harmonization, the development of methodological support, the enhancement of professional competence of specialists, the development of technical infrastructure, the promotion of a culture of transparency, and the adaptation of IFRS for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs). The implementation of these proposed measures will contribute to the improvement of the investment climate in the country and the strengthening of the position of Ukrainian businesses in the international arena. The conducted research confirms the necessity for the further harmonization of the national accounting system with IFRS through the implementation of comprehensive measures at the legislative, methodological, and educational levels. The adoption of these measures will facilitate a more effective integration of Ukraine into the global economic space, enhance investor confidence, and ensure the understandability and comparability of Ukrainian enterprises' financial information at the international level.

Author Biography

Anna Kostyakova, Dmitry Motorny Tavria State Agrotechnological University

Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor

References

Holov S. F., Prysmak M. N. (2023) MSFZ vitchyznianoi zvitnosti [IFRS for domestic reporting]. Visnyk MSFZ – IFRS Bulletin, vol. 8/13. Kyiv: TOV «LIHA ZAKON».

Zherdieva O. V. (2022) Otsinka za spravedlyvoiu vartistiu: perevahy ta nedoliky [Fair value valuation: advantages and disadvantages]. Formuvannia ekonomichnoho potentsialu subiektiv hospodariuvannia: problemy, perspektyvy, oblikovo-analitychne zabezpechennia- Formation of economic potential of business entities: problems, prospects, accounting and analytical support: zb. nauk. prats. Khmelnytskyi: KhNU. (in Ukrainian)

Kuzmin O. Ye., Bondar I. R. (2021) Vidminnosti mizh MSFZ ta P(S)BO: analitychnyi aspect [Differences between IFRS and GAAP: analytical aspect]. Finansy, oblik i audit - Finance, accounting and auditing, vol. 33, pp. 45–51.

Shvets N. V. (2020) Porivnialna kharakterystyka MSFZ i natsionalnykh standartiv [Comparative characteristics of IFRS and national standards]. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho universytetu. Seriia: Ekonomika - Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod University. Series: Economics, vol. 2(56), pp. 59–64.

Nobes C., Parker, R. (2020) Comparative International Accounting (14th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.

Zeff S. A. (2012) The Evolution of the IASC into the IASB, and the Challenges it Faces. The Accounting Review, vol. 87(3), pp. 807–837.

Alexander D., Nobes C. (2016) Financial Accounting: An International Introduction (6th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education.

Sopko V. V., Kaliuha S. M. (2019) Transformatsiia bukhhalterskoho obliku v umovakh perekhodu na MSFZ [Transformation of accounting in the context of transition to IFRS. ]. Oblik i finansy - Accounting and finance, vol. 3, pp. 15–22.

Zasadnyi B., Chubuk D. (2021) Osoblyvosti zastosuvannia mizhnarodnykh standartiv finansovoi zvitnosti v Ukraini [Peculiarities of the application of international financial reporting standards in Ukraine]. Oblik i finansy - Accounting and finance, vol. 1. pp. 78–84

Larson R. K., Street D. L. (2014) IFRS Adoption in Emerging Economies: Lessons from the Past and Recommendations for the Future. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, vol. 23(1), pp. 1–16.

Kharlamova O. (2024) MSFZ i NP(S)BO: 20 kliuchovykh vidminnostei [IFRS and NP(S)BO: 20 key differences]. Vse pro bukhhalterskyi oblik - All about accounting, vol. 97, pp.29-30

Shvets V.O. (2022) Osoblyvosti orhanizatsii bukhhalterskoho obliku za mizhnarodnymy standartamy [Features of organizing accounting according to international standards]. Oblik i finansy - Accounting and finance, vol. 1. pp. 45–52.

Napadovska L.V. (2021) Harmonizatsiia bukhhalterskoho obliku Ukrainy ta MSFZ: vyklyky i perspektyvy [Harmonization of Ukrainian accounting and IFRS: challenges and prospect]. Bukhhalterskyi oblik i audit - Accounting and auditing, vol. 8. S. 3–12

Deloitte. (2023) Pereotsinka tsinnostei: transformatsiia zvitnosti za MSFZ v Ukraini [Revaluation of values: transformation of IFRS reporting in Ukraine]. Analitychnyi ohliad - Analytical review, 37 p.

Analitychnyi zvit pro stan vprovadzhennia mizhnarodnykh standartiv finansovoi zvitnosti v Ukraini [Analytical report on the status of implementation of international financial reporting standards in Ukraine]. Available at: https://www.nssmc.gov.ua/about-us/annual-reports/ (accessed April 10, 2025)

Hutsailiuk L.I. (2023) Aktualni problemy vprovadzhennia MSFZ v Ukraini [Current problems of implementing IFRS in Ukraine]. Ekonomika i orhanizatsiia upravlinnia - Economics and management organization, vol. 2. pp. 87–92.

Demianenko N.I. (2023) Vnutrishnii kontrol i MSFZ: suchasni realii dlia ukrainskykh pidpryiemstv [Internal control and IFRS: modern realities for Ukrainian enterprises]. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho ekonomichnoho universytetu- Bulletin of the Kyiv National Economic University, vol. 5. pp. 58–64.

Published

2025-06-25