Organizational Design of Creative Agencies: Methodological Framework for Formation and Criteria for Performance Evaluation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58423/2786-6742/2025-11-58-71Keywords:
creative agencies, organizational design, organizational architecture, strategic flexibility, digital transformation, performance criteria, creative industries, experience economyAbstract
The relevance of the study is determined by the growing role of creative industries as a key driver of the modern economy and the need to develop adequate organizational models for their effective growth. Despite significant attention to this topic in the global literature, the Ukrainian academic discourse still lacks systematic methodological approaches to shaping the organizational design of creative agencies and criteria for evaluating their effectiveness. The problem is further complicated by rapid environmental changes, digitalization, and the introduction of artificial intelligence, all of which fundamentally reshape the requirements for organizational structures.
The purpose of the study is to identify the features of organizational design of creative agencies, determine the factors influencing the choice of their architecture, and substantiate methodological approaches and criteria for assessing effectiveness. The information base includes works of foreign and Ukrainian scholars, publications in professional journals, international and national rankings of creative agencies, and practical cases from large network companies and small boutique agencies.
The article reveals the evolution of scientific views on organizational design: from classical models of organic structures and adhocracy to modern approaches based on strategic flexibility, simplicity, digital readiness, and AI integration. Differences in organizational architectures depending on the scale of agencies are shown: large companies tend to use complex matrix structures, while smaller ones rely on more flexible and informal models. A system of performance evaluation criteria is proposed, covering both financial indicators (profitability, return on investment, speed-to-market) and non-financial ones (creativity level, client satisfaction, creative awards, staff turnover, and employee engagement).
The scientific novelty of the study lies in the development of a methodological framework for the organizational design of creative agencies, integrating flexible management models (adhocracy, agile, matrix structures), digital tools, strategic flexibility, and cultural relevance. The theoretical significance of the research lies in advancing organizational design methodology in creative industries. The practical significance lies in the applicability of the proposed provisions as a management tool for creative agency leaders, as a methodological basis for consultants and educational programs, and as a guideline for shaping state policies aimed at supporting the creative economy.
References
1. Burns,T., & Stalker, G. M. (1994). The Management of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Mintzberg, H. (2009). Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3. Lampel, J., & Germain, O. (2016). Creative industries as hubs of new organizational and business practices. Journal of Business Research, 69(7), 2327–2333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.032
4. Moeran, B. (2022). The Business of Creativity: Toward an Anthropology of Worth. London: Routledge.
5. Kyzym, M. (2020). Organizational foundations for the development of creative industries in Ukraine. Ekonomika i prognozuvannia, 2, 45–56. [in Ukrainian]
6. Melnyk, O. (2021). Management of creative enterprises in the context of digital transformation. Menedzhment ta pidpryiemnytstvo v Ukraini: etapy stanovlennia i problemy rozvytku, 1, 72–80. [in Ukrainian]
7. Verba, V. (2022). Features of organizational development of enterprises in the creative economy. Stratehiia ekonomichnoho rozvytku Ukrainy, 51, 134–143. [in Ukrainian]
8. Agostini, L. (2025). Emerging trends around strategic flexibility: a review and research agenda. Management Decision, 63(6),1835–1852. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-01-2025-0034
9. Jerab, J. (2024). How to design an effective organizational structure: the 21st century trends. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374423715
10. Joseph, D. (2025). How to design an effective organizational structure: the 21st century trends. Journal of Management, 51(4), 845–867. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063241271242
11. Clarke, R., & Joffe, H. (2025). Generative AI in creative industries: reshaping collaboration and trust. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.18938
12. Droga, D. (2025). Advertising needs to change what it is. The Australian. https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/growth-agenda/droga-advertising-needs-to-change-what-it-is
13. Graham, М. (2025). Omnicom Brings TBWA, BBDO and Other Agencies Under Same Leadership. The Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/omnicom-brings-tbwa-bbdo-and-other-agencies-under-same-leadership-851a7fa5
14. The Australian. (2025). Advertising heavyweights launch new model centred on strategy and creativity. https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/growth-agenda/advertising-heavyweights-launch-new-model-centred-on-strategy-and-creativity/news-story/d5c8ace1de12714a17e70e4a3437235d
15. Sociallyin. (2025). Top Creative Agencies in the US. https://sociallyin.com/resources/top-creative-agencies-us/
16. Algert. (2025). 7 KPIs to Measure Creative Agency Performance for Enterprise Brands. https://algert.co/blog/7-kpis-to-measure-creative-agency-performance-for-enterprise-brands/
17. WARC Rankings. (2024). WARC Creative 100: methodology overview. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/32d7/9bb266f33358319627410fbd7273f3fbfa44.pdf
18. Databox. (2025). Marketing Agencies Shared Top Case Studies and Precise Strategies Used. https://databox.com/marketing-agencies-shared-top-case-studies-precise-strategies-used
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Veronika Verba

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons CC BY-NC License.
