A Methodology for Identifying Parcel Trade in Global Statistical Classifications

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58423/2786-6742/2025-11-153-163

Keywords:

international trade, international economy, parcel trade, international statistic, transnational corporations, economic analysis

Abstract

International parcel trade constitutes an indispensable and strategically significant segment of the contemporary global economy, yet it remains only partially captured in existing statistical classifications. The aim of this study is to develop a methodological approach that isolates cross-border B2C parcels within core international trade datasets and establishes a parsimonious set of indicators for their economic assessment. The paper reviews the limitations of three key reference frameworks: the Harmonized System (HS), which lacks any identifier of the delivery channel; the Central Product Classification (CPC), which records only service flows; and the Extended Balance of Payments Services classification (EBOPS-2010), which aggregates monetary flows without linking them to merchandise values. The feasibility of integrating these three data blocks is explored through primary “tagging” of individual records. A minimum set of compulsory criteria is proposed-gross weight approximately 2 kg, individual (non-resident) consignee and transport code 50 “postal/courier”-supplemented by reinforcing attributes (Incoterms DDP/DAP, popular HS items, delivery lead time approximately 15 days) derived from CN 22/23 customs forms, UPU S10 tracking codes and banking payment data. On this basis, three integrated indicators are constructed: the number of B2C parcels (N), the average customs value per parcel (Vсер) and the cost-per-parcel (CPP), the latter calculated with the aid of EBOPS sub-code 3.4.2 “Courier services”. The resulting triad enables cross-country comparison of parcel flows, measurement of import elasticity with respect to the de minimis threshold, and rapid appraisal of the tariff burden borne by consumers. The proposed approach offers low implementation costs, high international comparability and flexible scalability (e.g., the future inclusion of fiscal or environmental metrics such as CO₂-per-parcel). Further research directions include modelling the fiscal effects of alternative de minimis scenarios, incorporating a carbon indicator and developing a “demand–tariff” simulation model to forecast micro-export dynamics over a medium-term horizon.

Author Biography

Tetiana Moiseienko, National Technical University of Ukraine «Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute»

Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor

References

1. World Customs Organization. (2021). Harmonized commodity description and coding system: 2022 edition. Brussels: WCO. https://www.wcoomd.org/en/topics/nomenclature/instrument-and-tools/hs_nomenclature_previous_editions/hs_2022/2022-edition.aspx

2. United Nations Statistical Division. (2015). Central product classification: Version 2.1. New York: United Nations. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ

3. United Nations, OECD, IMF, Eurostat, & World Trade Organization. (2012). Manual on statistics of international trade in services 2010 (MSITS 2010), Annex II: EBOPS 2010 classification. New York: United Nations. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/tradeserv/msits/

4. International Monetary Fund. (2009). Balance of payments and international investment position manual: Sixth edition (BPM6). Washington, D.C.: IMF. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/bop/2007/pdf/bpm6.pdf

5. United Nations. (2025). UN Comtrade: Commodity trade statistics database [Electronic resource]. https://comtrade.un.org

6. Eurostat. (2025). COMEXT – Foreign trade database. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/international-trade-in-goods/data/database

7. World Trade Organization. (2025). WTO statistics database. https://stats.wto.org

8. McKinsey & Company. (2023). Cross-border e-commerce parcel delivery: Global market insights 2023. New York: McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/travel-logistics-and-infrastructure/our-insights

9. European Commission. (2025). Import control system 2 (ICS2): Factsheet. https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/customs-4/customs-security/import-control-system-2_en

10. European Commission. (2025). Common transit convention: Guidelines for operators. https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/customs-4/customs-procedures/common-transit_en

11. Universal Postal Union. (2024). Standard S10/S15: Identification of postal items. Bern: UPU. https://www.upu.int/en/activities/standards

12. Universal Postal Union. (2024). Customs declaration forms CN 22 / CN 23: Guidelines. Bern: UPU. https://www.upu.int/en/activities/postal-security/customs-forms

13. Eurostat. (2024). E-commerce statistics for individuals and enterprises: 2024 edition. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/digital-economy-and-society

14. Moiseienko, T. Ye., & Korohodova, O. O. (2024). International trade: Lecture notes. Kyiv: KPI im. Ihoria Sikorskoho. https://ela.kpi.ua/handle/123456789/72425 [in Ukrainian]

15. United Nations, European Commission, International Monetary Fund, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, & World Bank. (2009). System of national accounts 2008. New York: United Nations. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/nationalaccount/sna2008.asp

16. European Commission. (2022). Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 as regards corporate sustainability reporting (CSRD). Official Journal of the European Union, L 322, 15–63. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2464/oj

Published

2025-12-17

Issue

Section

Economics and management