Analysis of the effect of Environmental Management Accounting Costing Techniques on Energy Consumption in South African Manufacturing Companies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58423/2786-6742/2026-12-301-315Keywords:
Activity-based costing, costing techniques, energy consumption, environmental management accounting, life cycle costing, material flow cost accountingAbstract
Manufacturing companies are widely recognised for their intensive energy consumption, which significantly contributes to global environmental degradation. These challenges are further exacerbated by the limitations of traditional costing techniques, which often fail to measure environmental and energy-related costs accurately. In response to these shortcomings, environmental management accounting (EMA) has emerged as an important managerial tool aimed at addressing environmental challenges and improving the quality of decision-making. This paper aims to examine the effect of EMA costing techniques on energy consumption in South African manufacturing companies listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. In the empirical model, EMA costing techniques represent the independent variables and are proxied by activity-based costing (ABC), material flow cost accounting (MFCA), and life cycle costing (LCC). Energy consumption serves as the dependent variable. The study adopts a quantitative research design based on secondary data collected from the annual, integrated, and sustainability reports of selected companies over a ten-year period (2013–2022). Multivariate regression analysis was employed to assess the relationship between the study variables. Additionally, diagnostic tests, including normality, heteroscedasticity, and multicollinearity tests, were conducted to ensure compliance with the assumptions underlying regression analysis and to validate the robustness of the empirical results. The findings reveal a positive and statistically significant relationship between ABC and energy consumption. A positive, though statistically insignificant, relationship was identified between MFCA and energy consumption. Furthermore, the results indicate a negative and statistically significant relationship between LCC and energy consumption, suggesting that the application of life cycle costing may contribute to improved energy efficiency. This study contributes to the EMA literature by integrating ABC, MFCA, and LCC within a single analytical framework and by identifying the costing techniques that are more effective in reducing energy consumption. The results provide practical implications for manufacturing companies, encouraging them to enhance the adoption and strategic application of EMA costing techniques in order to unlock potential environmental and economic benefits associated with their implementation.
References
1. Ahmad, S. A., & Sulaiman, G. A. (2023). The role of attributes based costing technology in achieving sustainable development goals. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(2), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i2.1105
2. Akgün, M., Katanalp, B., Can, A. V., & Kıymaz Kıvraklar, M. (2023). Adapting the activity-based costing method for water footprint accounting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 400, 136691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136691
3. Amicarelli, V., Lombardi, M., Varese, E., & Bux, C. (2023). Material flow and economic cost analysis of the Italian artisan bread production before and during the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 101, 107101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107101
4. Bux, C., & Amicarelli, V. (2022). Material flow cost accounting (MFCA) to enhance environmental entrepreneurship in the meat sector: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Environmental Management, 313, 115001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115001
5. Dahi, H. N., & Abdullah, H. S. (2024). Application of material flow cost accounting technology to support green productivity and its reflection in achieving sustainable development. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 9(1), 24815. https://doi.org/10.55267/iadt.07.14314
6. Dong, Y., Zhao, Y., Wang, H., Liu, P., He, Y., & Lin, G. (2022). Integration of life cycle assessment and life cycle costing for the eco-design of rubber products. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 595. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04633-6
7. Fakoya, M. B., & Imuezerua, E. O. (2020a). Improving water pricing decisions through material flow cost accounting model: a case study of the Politsi Water Treatment Scheme in South Africa. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(2), 2243-2260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00672-7
8. Fakoya, M. B., & Imuezerua, E. O. (2020b). Identifying ‘true’ water loss information through the MFCA model for improved cost-saving decisions in a water utility: A case study of the Doorndraai water treatment scheme in South Africa. Sustainability, 12(18), 7824. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187824
9. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press.
10. Freeman, R. E., Dmytriyev, S. D., & Phillips, R. A. (2021). Stakeholder theory and the resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 47(7), 1757-1770. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206321993576
11. Friedman, M. (1970). A Friedman doctrine: The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, 13, 32-33.
12. Fu, G., Liu, J., Yang, J., Liu, X., Yao, D., & Ni, J. (2020). Eco-cost analysis of split air-conditioner using activity-based costing method. IEEE Access, 8, 54952-54962. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2976853
13. Garcez, M. R. (2022). Economic performance of buildings through life cycle costing. Journal of Urban & Environmental Engineering, 16(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.4090/juee.2022.v16n1.003014
14. Jouber, H. (2023). Environmental sustainability performance and shareholder value: an international fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. EuroMed Journal of Business, 1450-2194. https://doi.org/10.1108/emjb-09-2022-0161
15. Luken, R. A., & Saieed, A. (2023). Exploring measures beyond energy efficiency with the transfer of environmentally sound technology methodology. Cleaner Environmental Systems, 10, 100133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesys.2023.100133
16. Malapa, D., & Ngwakwe, C. (2025). Influence of Environmental Efficiency on the Financial Performance of JSE-Listed Food and Beverage Producers. Acta Academiae Beregsasiensis. Economics(8), 410-426. https://doi.org/10.58423/2786-6742/2025-8-410-426
17. Mashkoor, I. A. S. A., Ali, J. H., & Al-Kanani, M. M. (2023). The role of green activity-based costing in achieving sustainability development: Evidence from Iraq. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(4), e01276. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i4.1276
18. Matiin, N. (2022). Implementation of activity based costing (ABC) for rub oil products at UD. Making oil rub hero Samarinda. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 5(1), 1134-1142. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i1.3714
19. Mura, R., Vicentini, F., Botti, L. M., & Chiriacò, M. V. (2023). Economic and environmental outcomes of a sustainable and circular approach: Case study of an Italian wine-producing firm. Journal of Business Research, 154, 113300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113300
20. Mura, R., Vicentini, F., Botti, L. M., & Chiriacò, M. V. (2024). Achieving the circular economy through environmental policies: Packaging strategies for more sustainable business models in the wine industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(2), 1497-1514. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3556
21. Najaf, H. S., Obaid, A. J., & Jappar3, M. S. (2024). Applying material flow cost accounting (MFCA) to improve both production processes and environmental performance: Applied study at Najaf thermal brick manufacturing plant. Kurdish Studies, 12(2), 2298-2308. https://doi.org/10.58262/ks.v12i2.166
22. Nakeng, M. V., & Ngwakwe, C. (2025). Analysis of the Effect of Corporate Social Investment on Resource Efficiency. Acta Academiae Beregsasiensis. Economics(9), 244-256. https://doi.org/10.58423/2786-6742/2025-9-244-256
23. Nishitani, K., Kokubu, K., Wu, Q., Kitada, H., Guenther, E., & Guenther, T. (2022). Material flow cost accounting (MFCA) for the circular economy: An empirical study of the triadic relationship between MFCA, environmental performance, and the economic performance of Japanese companies. Journal of Environmental Management, 303 114219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114219
24. Nyakuwanika, M., van der Poll, H. M., & van der Poll, J. A. (2021). A conceptual framework for greener goldmining through environmental management accounting practices (EMAPs): The case of Zimbabwe. Sustainability, 13(18), 10466. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810466
25. Nyakuwanika, M., Van Der Poll, H. M., & Van Der Poll, J. A. (2023). Validating an environmental management accounting practices framework for the greening of Zimbabwean goldmining. Journal of Sustainability Science and Management, 18(10), 98-125. https://doi.org/10.46754/jssm.2023.10.007
26. Nyikahadzoi, L., Lotriet, R., & Smit, A. (2022). Assessing the nature of corporate environmental responsibility in Zimbabwe’s gold mining sector. Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences, 15(1), 712.
27. Nyimbili, F., & Nyimbili, L. (2024). Types of purposive sampling techniques with their examples and application in qualitative research studies. British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies, 5(1), 90-99. https://doi.org/10.37745/bjmas.2022.0419
28. Opeyemi, B. M. (2021). Path to sustainable energy consumption: The possibility of substituting renewable energy for non-renewable energy. Energy, 228, 120519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120519
29. Ortiz-Cea, V., Dote-Pardo, J., Geldres-Weiss, V. V., & Peña-Acuña, V. (2025). The role of activity-based costing in reducing environmental impact: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 17(3), 1275.
30. Putra, P., Zainal, A., Harahap, K., Agusti, I., Saputra, H., & Afrida, F. (2025). The impact of green factors and digitalization to firm value and firm performance: Evidence from micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) in Medan City. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Innovation in Education, Science, and Culture, ICIESC 2024, 17 September 2024, Medan, Indonesia. http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.17-9-2024.2352853
31. Usul, H., & Olgun, E. B. (2025). An analysis of material flow cost accounting in companies using different cost accounting systems. Heliyon, 11(4), e42555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42555
32. Van der Poll, H. M. (2021). From footprint to handprint through environmental management accounting: the case of South Africa. 8th international conference on opportunities and challenges in management, economics and accounting. Diamond Scientific Publishing, Paris,
33. Van der Poll, H. M. (2024). Responsible consumption and production to address climate change through environmental management accounting: The case of South Africa. In SDGs in Africa and the Middle East Region (pp. 1-33). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91260-4_73-1
34. Vogiantzi, C., & Tserpes, K. (2025). A comparative environmental and economic analysis of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer recycling processes using life cycle assessment and life cycle costing. Journal of Composites Science, 9(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs9010039
35. Weerasinghe, A. S., Ramachandra, T., & Rotimi, J. O. B. (2021). Comparative life-cycle cost (LCC) study of green and traditional industrial buildings in Sri Lanka. Energy and Buildings, 234, 110732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110732
36. Zhang, R., & Li, J.-L. (2021). The application of activity-based costing in the cost calculation of thermal-power enterprise. Thermal Science, 25(2 Part A), 933-939. https://doi.org/10.2298/tsci200525254z
37. Zhang, Y., Zhao, X., & Fu, B. (2022). Impact of energy saving on the financial performance of industrial enterprises in China: An empirical analysis based on propensity score matching. Journal of Environmental Management, 317, 115377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115377
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Segopotje MALATJI, Collins NGWAKWE
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons CC BY-NC License.
