Іmpact of Ukraine-Russia war on global trade and development: an empirical study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58423/2786-6742/2022-1-80-92Keywords:
international trade, global economy, GDP, crisis, sanctionsAbstract
The crisis in Ukraine has created a humanitarian crisis of immense proportions and has also dealt a severe blow to the globe economy. The brunt of the suffering and destruction are being felt by the people of Ukraine themselves but the prices in terms of reduced trade and output are likely to be felt by people round the world through higher food and energy prices and reduced availability of products exported by Russia and Ukraine. Poorer countries are at high risk from the war, since they have a tendency to spend a bigger fraction of their incomes on food compared to wealthier countries, this might impact huge political stability globally. From a macroeconomic perspective, higher prices for food and energy will reduce real incomes and depress global import demand. Sanctions will impose economic costs on not only Russia directly but also on its trading partners. Besides Russia and Ukraine, depressed gross domestic product (GDP) will probably be seen mostly in Europe given the region’s geographic proximity and its dependence on Russian energy. Trade costs will rise within the near term because of extraordinary sanctions, export restrictions, higher energy costs and transport disruptions furthermore. As a result, the impact of the war will wear world interchange 2022 might be greater than the impact on global GDP. While shares of Russia and Ukraine in world trade and output are relatively small, they're important suppliers of essential products, notably food and energy. Both countries accounted for 2.5 percent in world merchandise trade and 1.9 per cent in world GDP in 2021. Yet they supplied around 25 per cent of wheat, 15 per cent of barley and 45 per cent of sunflower products exports in 2019. Russia alone accounted for 9.4 percent of world trade fuels, including a 20 per cent share in fossil fuel exports. Many countries are highly obsessed on food imports from Russia and Ukraine. for instance, over 1/2 wheat imports in Egypt, the Lebanon and Tunisia come from Russia and Ukraine. Other countries are more addicted to imports of fuels from Russia, like Finland (63 percent) and Turkey (35 percent). Russia and Ukraine also are key providers of inputs into industrial value chains. Russia is one in all the most suppliers globally of palladium and rhodium, key inputs within the production of catalytic converters within the automotive sector and therefore the manufacture of semiconductors. Semiconductor production also depends to a considerable extent on neon supplied by Ukraine, which further provides variety of low-tech products to the ecu automobile value chain, like wire harnesses. Prolonged disruptions within the supply of those goods could harm the recovery of automobile manufacturing. Sanctions are already having a robust impact on Russia’s economy, with possible medium to long-term consequences. Disconnecting Russian banks from the SWIFT settlement system and blocking Russia’s use of interchange reserves have triggered a pointy depreciation of the ruble, reducing real incomes within the country. Most of the massive international firms also are abandoning the Russian market. Oil and gas exports have yet to be strongly full of the sanctions, but the crisis could accelerate the worldwide transition towards greener energy sources. Longstanding economic relationships are disrupted by the war and by the sanctions imposed in its wake. Eminent economists have simulated various scenarios parenthetically the channels through which trade may well be affected and to explore possible short-run and long-run effects. Global trade growth is projected to slow by up to 2.2 percentage points in 2022. long term impacts could even be large and consequential. there's a risk that trade could become more fragmented in terms of blocs supported geopolitics. whether or not no formal blocs emerge, private actors might prefer to minimize risk by reorienting supply chains. this might reduce global GDP within the long term by about 5 percent, notably by restricting competition and stifling innovation (WTO, 2022). The Global Economy has a crucial role to play in mitigating the negative effects of the crisis and in rebuilding a post-war global economy. Keeping markets open are critical to confirm that economic opportunities remain receptive all countries. this can be very true within the post-war period, when businesses and families will have to repair their balance sheets and rebuild their lives. Through its importance for international trade and its monitoring, convening and other functions, the WTO is central to making sure that international trade continues to serve billions of individuals across the globe. during this paper we are giving an empirical analysis of world trade and development impacted by the present Russian-Ukraine war.
References
International Monetary Fund. 2022. Global Financial Stability Report—Shockwaves from the War in Ukraine Test the Financial System’s Resilience. Washington, DC, April. Available at: https://www.imf.org/-/media/Files/Publications/GFSR/2022/April/English/text.ashx (accessed: 25.05.2022)
World Trade Organization (2022), The crisis in Ukraine: Implications of the war for global trade and development. URL: https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/imparctukraine422_e.pdf (accessed: 25.05.2022)
Amann, C. and Carey, N. (2022), “Ukraine invasion hampers wire harness supplies for carmakers” (Reuters, 2 March 2022).
International Monetary Fund (IMFa) (2022), World Economic Outlook Update: Rising Caseloads, a Disrupted Recovery, and Higher Inflation, Washington, D.C.: IMF.
Eddy, N. (2022), Leoni boosts Ukraine wire harness output amid risk of Russian rocket attacks. Automotive News Europe, 23 March 2022.
Nuttall, C. (2022), Ukraine war is chip industry’s kryptonite. Financial Times, 4 March 2022.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2022), The Importance of Ukraine and the Russian Federation for Global Agricultural Markets and the Risks Associated with the Current Conflict. Information Note, Rome: FAO.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2022), Economic and Social Impacts and Policy Implications of the War in Ukraine, OECD Publishing, Paris.
Góes, C. and Bekkers, E. (2022), The Impact of Geopolitical Conflicts on Trade, Growth, and Innovation, arXiv:2203.12173v1.
Saul, J. (2022), Ukraine’s ports to stay closed until Russian invasion ends – maritime administration. Reuters (28 February 2022).
Gronholt-pedersen, J. and Shabong, Y. (2022), Companies shut Ukraine operations, assess impact of sanctions on Russia (Reuters, 25 February 2022).
Mohamed A. El-Erian. Ukraine War Hastens Investor Migration to Private Markets. Bloomberg: European Edition. Available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2022-03-31/ukraine-war-hastens-investor-migration-to-private-markets (accessed: 25.05.2022)
International banking and financial market developments: BIS Quarterly Review. March 2022. Available at: https://www.bis.org/publ/qtrpdf/r_qt2203.pdf (accessed: 25.05.2022)
Committing up to $5 million for humanitarian relief in Ukraine: JP Morgan Chase case study. Available at: https://www.jpmorgan.com/news/an-update-on-our-response-to-the-humanitarian-crisis-in-ukraine (accessed: 25.05.2022)
UNHCR (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees) (2022). “UN High Commissioner for Refugees Calls for Immediate End to Ukraine War, Which Has Uprooted over 10 Million People.” March 31.
UNHCR Data Portal. (2022). Operational Data Portal: Ukraine Refugee Situation. Available at: https://data2.unhcr.org/en/situations/ukraine (accessed: 05.04.2022)
WFP (World Food Programme) (2022). Food Security Implications of the Ukraine Conflict. World Food Programme, Rome.
World Bank (2022). War in the Region: Europe and Central Asia Economic Update. World Bank, Washington, DC.
Becker, T., B. Eichengreen, Y. Gorodnichenko, S. Guriev, S. Johnson, T. Mylovanov, K. Rogoff, and B. Weder di Mauro (2022). A Blueprint for the Reconstruction of Ukraine. CEPR Rapid Response Economics, Center for Economic Policy Research, London.
Caldara, D. and M. Iacoviello (2022). Measuring Geopolitical Risk. American Economic Review, April, 112(4), pp.1194-1225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20191823
Arvis, Jean-François, Cordula Rastogi, and Daniel Saslavsky (2022). Effects of the war in Ukraine on Global Logistics and Connectivity. Chapter 3 in The Impact of the War in Ukraine on Global Trade and Investment. Michele Ruta (Ed.). The World Bank.
Brenton, Paul, Michael Ferrantino, and Maryla Maliszewska (2022). Reshaping Global Value Chains in Light of COVID-19 Implications for Trade and Poverty Reduction in Developing Countries. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1821-9
Liu, Yan (2022), “Implications of the war in Ukraine on Global FDI,” Chapter 6 in The Impact of the War in Ukraine on Global Trade and Investment. Michele Ruta (Ed.). The World Bank.
Ruta, Michele, Nadia Rocha and Alvaro Espitia (2022), “Effects of the Conflict in Ukraine on Food Trade,” Chapter 2 in The Impact of the War in Ukraine on Global Trade and Investment. Michele Ruta (Ed.). The World Bank.
Winkler, Deborah, Wuester, Lucie and David Knight (2022), “Russia’s global value chain participation: Implications of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine for its trade partners and key value chains,” The World Bank.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2022b). IMF Staff Statement on the Economic Impact of War in Ukraine. Available at: https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2022/03/05/pr2261-imf-staff-statement-on-the-economic-impact-of-war-in-ukraine (accessed: 25.05.2022).
J.P. Morgan (2022). The Russia-Ukraine Crisis: What Does It Mean For Markets? Available at: https://www.jpmorgan.com/insights/research/russia-ukraine-crisis-market-impact (accessed: 25.05.2022).
Krugman, P. (2022). Wonking Out: Putin’s Other Big Miscalculation. The New York Times. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/04/opinion/russia-ukraine-sanctions-economy. html?referringSource=articleShare (accessed: 25.05.2022).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Acta Academiae Beregsasiensis. Economics
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1969b/1969b75d43f222ee39a1dfab014e298d35e3fc1b" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons CC BY-NC License.